Fit and Fabulous Over 40

Home

Are You willing to Risk Total Blindness to Save Your Vision?

Are You willing to Risk Total Blindness to Save Your Vision?
May 19
13:17 2017

Vision is by far our most precious sense. It means more than being able to read, it also means being able to see the smile on loved ones’ faces. It means being able to see which produce or meat is better than others in the store. It means being able to drive to find your way to the store. It also means being able to do many types of crafts and household chores.

My daughter is losing her vision due to a rare non-hereditary genetic disorder. She is 40 and legally blind, although she has some vision. She can see a person’s outline and shape, and movement, but she can’t distinguish faces until she hears a familiar voice. This reality hit her really hard a while back at church one Sunday when all she could see was a man standing in front of her, but she didn’t know who it was (it was the pastor) until he spoke to her. The realization of not being able to see who it was brought her to tears. Her loss of vison has also affected her depth perception. Stairs appear to be all one level unless there is some kind of contrast in color to designate the edge of one step from the next step up or down. Her greatest fear is losing the rest of her vision and becoming totally black blind, which is a very strong eventual prognosis for her future.

She also has a tumor that is pressing on her optic nerves but neither she nor the doctors want to take the risk of surgically removing the tumor for fear of further damaging the optic nerves and leaving her totally blind. To her, the risks outweigh the possibility of restoring some of her vision, but not all, or slowing down the process of vision loss.

In my own case, if it weren’t for the miracles of modern medicine, I would be blind. Years ago, my vision was 20/250 in one eye and 20/300 in the other. I ventured to have radial keratotomy performed on both eyes, where they make a few cuts on the outer surface to reshape the eye and improve vision. It was very successful and I went without glasses for nearly 7 years until my eyes began to get far-sighted, which was interesting since I was very near-sighted before the procedure.

Then I had cataracts in both eyes, about 5 years apart. That helped a great deal. Then I had a partial retinal detachment in one eye and ended up in emergency surgery to re-attach the retina. Several years later, the same thing happened in the other and again surgery re-attached the retina.

Today, I can see close up better with no glasses than with. Distances are blurrier and I need to use my glasses to see details far away or on the television across the living room. Between the cataracts and retinal detachments, I would be totally blind today without the miracles of eye surgery. If these things had happened 50 years ago, I would be blind.

With the importance of vision, how far are you willing to go to preserve or restore your vision?

Would you be willing to risk your vision on an experimental and unproven treatment?

Today, one of the most common causes of blindness is macular degeneration, which often hits men and women in the later years, but can also occur in younger people. A recent study was just released that reported that three elderly women, suffering from macular degeneration in Florida, who opted for a controversial treatment procedure to save their vision.

Doctors took stem cells from their fat tissue and then injected them into the eyes in hopes that the stem cells would develop into healthy eye tissue and reverse or replace the effects of the macular degeneration. In the case of these three elderly ladies in Florida, the procedure left them totally blind.

However, another report sheds a ray of light in the darkness of blindness as it reports another patient received stem treatment for their macular degeneration, only this time, doctors used stem cells from the skin, not fatty tissue. The progression of vision loss appeared to be stopped, but not improved. Doctors are not sure if it was the stem cell treatment or not.

George Q. Daley, Dean of the Harvard Medical School commented about the two studies, saying:

“These two reports are about as stark a contrast as it gets.”

Again, I ask: With the importance of vision, how far are you willing to go to preserve or restore your vision?

Would you be willing to risk your vision on an experimental and unproven treatment?

Before you jump at doing something that sounds great, take some time to do some research on your own. Don’t take the doctor’s word for it as sometimes they have other reasons for pushing experimental treatments. Do some research and educate yourself on what you are considering before it’s too late and you lose all your vision.

About Author

Fit&Fab

Fit&Fab

Related Articles

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Write a Comment